Power Consumption (Idle and Gaming)
Putting realistic, repeatable load on a GPU to get a decent idea of its real world power consumption and thermal output has long been something we've experimented here at
bit-tech. We've found that Synthetic benchmarks such as FurMark thrash the GPU constantly, which simply isn't reflective of how GPU will be used when gaming.
It's such a hardcore test that any GPU under test is almost guaranteed to hit its thermal limit, the mark at which the card's firmware will kick in, speeding up the fan to keep the GPU within safe temperature limits. Conversely, simply leaving a game like
Crysis running at a certain point also isn't reflective of real world use. There's no guarantee that the GPU is being pushed as hard as other titles might do, and the load will vary from play through to play through.
Eventually then, we've decided to use 3DMark06's Canyon Flight test as a real world representative, repeatable graphics test. It's a ferociously demanding test, pushing graphics cards to their limit, but also containing peaks and troughs in performance that match real world game play.
As the test is so demanding and GPU limited, we've set 3DMark to run the test at 1,280 x 1,024 with 0xAA and 16xAF (enabled in the driver), constantly looping the test for thirty minutes and recording the maximum power consumption and GPU Delta T (the difference between the temperature of the GPU and the ambient temperature in our labs).
-
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB
-
ATI Radeon HD 5970 2GB
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB
Power at socket (W)
-
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB
-
ATI Radeon HD 5970 2GB
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB
Power at socket (W, lower is better)
Thermal Performance
-
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 5970 2GB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB
delta T (°C) (lower is better)
-
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 1,792MB
-
ATI Radeon HD 5970 2GB
-
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB
delta T (°C) (lower is better)
For analysis of these results, please read the
Results Analysis page.
Want to comment? Please log in.